**MYTH:** Nigel Farage's proposal to ban asylum seekers with HIV from NHS treatment is a reasonable immigration policy. **TRUTH:** This proposal represents a dangerous attack on fundamental human rights and medical ethics that would condemn vulnerable people to preventable suffering and death. Denying life-saving HIV treatment to asylum seekers violates the UK's obligations under international human rights law, including the right to health and the prohibition against inhuman and degrading treatment. The policy deliberately targets people based on both their asylum status and medical condition—a form of medical discrimination that the World Health Organization and British Medical Association have consistently condemned as unethical and counterproductive. Beyond the moral horror of condemning people to die from a treatable condition, this proposal would create a public health disaster. Untreated HIV increases transmission risks and places additional strain on emergency services when people inevitably require crisis intervention. The policy also violates the core medical principle that healthcare should be provided based on need, not immigration status. Farage's doubling down on this 2015 pledge reveals a calculated cruelty designed to dehumanize asylum seekers and normalize the idea that some human lives are disposable—a dangerous precedent that threatens the foundational values of both medical care and human dignity. *Sources: WHO Guidelines on Health Services for Asylum Seekers, British Medical Association Ethics Guidelines, UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights*